Process Measurement & Balanced Scorecard in an organization: Comparative study

In large companies Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is used as a management tool to align efforts of different teams/groups/departments to achieve specific high level objectives / programs / goals. Under it, Key Performance Measures (KPMs) are defined under 4 perspectives: 1) Finance; 2) Customers/Peers; 3) Internal Business Performance; 4) Learning & Growth.

It serves as a tool for management to monitor the performance of various teams/groups/departments and encourage/reward the target achievers. This is usually prepared every year and monitored on quarterly basis. It is preared in a tabular form in Excel.

On the other hand process measurement sheet (PMS) which is being advocated in this blog details the core processes of teams/groups/departments. This is an essential tool for the head of teams/groups/departments to know their effectiveness of their processes.

However, staff sometimes feel that BSC is meant for performance so why to implement PMS. An effort is made to clarify the purpose of these two tools.
Measurement of Process
BSC / Key Performance Indicators
It is used to know the effectiveness of the processes
It is used to know effectiveness of achieving any desired goal / programs / objectives
Mandatory for each entity of organization i.e. department or team involved in providing services to measure the effectiveness of core processes
Generally high level of goal / programs / objectives are measured on 4 perspectives
An essential tool with the entity itself teams/groups/departments for assessing its own process and to take remedial steps to improve the level of performance.
It is a tool for top management to monitor the performance of entity on specific goal / programs / objectives.
All core processes need to be measured and compared with the targets and actions need to be taken to improve the processes
Monitoring is done for only those high level programs / objective which top management think for itself
Not for alignment
Only to align all the teams and groups to achieve specific program / projects issues.
Self-assessment and improvement for the quality of services being provided
Assessment by management and for achieving specific goal
It focuses improvement in the services
Main focus is to acheive high level program / objective
A tool within the team/department
It comes from outside from top management
Self-correcting tool
Forced correction
Not for an incentive
For incentive
Essential for making strong foundation/institutions
Not necessarily will lead to institution building
Actions taken are preventive actions
Addresses issues only hence are corrective actions
In line with ISO requirements
In line with ISO requirements

No comments:

Post a Comment